Why AI Gets Your Location and Jurisdiction Wrong

11 December 2025

Too busy to read the full article? Here are the key takeaways at a glance.


TLDR


Pillar 5 information


• AI often misreads a firm’s location or jurisdiction because signals across the web don’t line up.
• When AI isn’t sure where you’re based, local visibility drops immediately.
• Old directories, partner bios and scattered geographic references tend to be the root cause.
• Location and jurisdiction are foundational classification signals within The 5 Pillar System™.
• Cleaning up these signals restores visibility surprisingly quickly.


Key Takeaways


• AI needs consistent reinforcement.
• Outdated external data undermines local visibility more than most firms expect.
• Jurisdiction must be stated clearly. Implicit cues aren’t enough.
• Local visibility depends on alignment across multiple platforms, not just your website.
• These issues rarely resolve themselves. They require structured correction.

When Geography Starts Working Against You

Most partners feel confident about their location signals. The address is on the website. It’s on GBP. It appears in a few bios and the footer. What could possibly go wrong?


Quite a lot, as it turns out.


In almost every AI Visibility Audit, I find location drift that no one expected. And once AI becomes uncertain about where you’re based, the impact is immediate. You fall out of local prompts. Competitor sets shift unexpectedly. Enquiries come from the wrong places or dry up entirely.


This naturally leads to three questions:


Why does AI get something as simple as our location wrong?


Which location signals is AI relying on that we don’t see?


What are the real-world signs that AI has misread our geography?



Why does AI get something as simple as our location wrong?

Because AI doesn’t trust a single source. It builds your location from a pattern of signals scattered across the web.

When even a few of those signals point in the wrong direction, AI becomes cautious.


And cautious AI reduces visibility.


Here are the most common causes:


1. Old directories that never got updated

A forgotten listing from years ago can have more influence than your current website.


2. Small inconsistencies in NAP details

High Street vs High St, different phone formats, slight postcode variations.
Tiny signals, but AI reads them as instability.


3. Partner bios with historic locations

People carry their previous geography with them.
If a bio references another city or region, AI sees it.


4. Scattered or unclear service geography

If your content mentions several towns but doesn’t anchor them, AI can’t determine your centre of gravity.


5. Missing schema

Without structured reinforcement, AI relies on whichever source looks most consistent, even if it’s outdated.

So the first answer is straightforward:


AI gets your location wrong when the signals around the web don’t agree with each other.

Which leads naturally to the next question.

Which location signals is AI relying on that we don’t see?

This is where partners are usually most surprised. You think AI is reading your website.

Fact is, AI is reading your entire history.


Here are the signals you probably aren’t monitoring:


1. Legacy citations you forgot existed

Even one old citation can pull your location off course.


2. Third-party profiles you didn’t create

Business registries, outdated association listings, niche legal directories.


3. Old map data

Historic coordinates sometimes persist in Google’s mapping ecosystem.


4. Conflicting jurisdiction cues across your site

AI won’t assume England and Wales unless you state it.

If some pages say UK and some say nothing, the signal weakens.


5. Partner pages that don’t match your current footprint

Bio pages often hold the strongest geographic contradictions.


So the second answer is this:


AI is influenced by signals you don’t see, and it trusts them when they appear consistent.


Now the next question becomes impossible to ignore.


What are the real-world signs that AI has misread our geography?

Location errors rarely appear as obvious failures.
They reveal themselves through patterns of behaviour.


The clearest signs include:


1. You stop appearing in local prompts

Prompts like family lawyer near me or solicitor in [location] stop surfacing your firm.


2. Local competitors with weaker reputations outrank you

AI prioritises geographic certainty over professional strength.


3. Your jurisdiction appears blurred

AI may treat you as active in a region you don’t serve, or ignore the one you do.


4. Your strongest practice areas collapse locally

This happens when AI thinks you’re serving the wrong geographic market.



5. AI descriptions mention towns or regions you don’t recognise

When AI’s language no longer reflects your real footprint, geography has drifted.


So the third answer is clear:
You know AI has your location wrong when its behaviour doesn’t match your real-world geography.


So, how do you fix it?

How do we correct the location and jurisdiction issues AI is picking up?

Here is the structured approach used within The 5 Pillar System™.


1. Align every instance of your name, address and phone number

GBP, directories, citations, bios and your website must all match.


2. Update or remove outdated listings

These often cause the strongest drift.


3. State your jurisdiction clearly and establish one geographic anchor


AI won’t infer it.
A simple line such as Serving clients across England and Wales stabilises the signal. AI models (and Google’s local algorithm) do form a single “entity centroid” to understand your primary geographical identity.

If your signals point to Manchester, Liverpool, Chester AND London equally, the model becomes unsure  and you vanish from visibility.

You can still serve multiple locations; the issue is conflicting signals.


Good practice additions:

Choose ONE primary HQ office as your “entity anchor" because even if you serve multiple towns, AI needs a single centre of gravity.


Add additional service areas in a controlled, structured format (not random town lists) and keep all citations pointing to your main HQ.


4. Strengthen partner bios

People pages anchor your geography as much as the firm does.


5. Add LocalService schema

This gives AI machine-readable clarity and strengthens Pillars 4 and 5.


Conclusion

Location and jurisdiction look simple, but they’re two of the most influential classification cues AI relies on. When these cues conflict, AI hesitates. And when AI hesitates, visibility drops.


The good news is that location issues are some of the easiest to diagnose and correct. Once your signals are aligned, AI stabilises quickly and visibility improves.


An AI Visibility audit will show you exactly where your signals have drifted and how to correct them. Or check out this blog post on how to do your own AI Audit in under an hour.



Want a full AI Visibility Audit?


We analyse how every major AI system describes your firm and show you exactly

what to fix for better accuracy, trust and visibility.



 Request your AI Visibility Audit

AI search ecosystem diagram. Central robot figure with connections to entities, deep content, machine readability, and trust.
14 December 2025
Why AI relies on repeated, consistent signals to build confidence in law firms, and how misaligned information quietly reduces visibility.
AI search ecosystem graphic with a robot at center, connected to
14 December 2025
How AI groups law firms into competitor sets, why vague category signals cause misgrouping, and how this quietly affects visibility in AI search.
AI search ecosystem diagram: a robot surrounded by icons representing entities, deep content, machine readability, and trust.
14 December 2025
How AI combines category, entity and trust signals to form a belief about your law firm, and why misalignment leads to lost visibility.
Person holding a smartphone displaying the ChatGPT website.
14 December 2025
What AI actually treats as evidence about a law firm, why claims and reputation don’t count, and how consistency shapes trust and visibility in AI search.
Blue infographic with law-related icons radiating from a question mark. Includes scales, courthouse, and shield.
11 December 2025
A clear explanation of how law firms weaken their category signals and how AI misclassifies them. Learn how to correct category errors using The 5 Pillar System™.
Hourglass, laptop with search bar, desk, green lamp, and bookshelves in a wood-paneled office.
10 December 2025
Assess your law firm’s AI visibility in one hour. Learn how models classify your services and where to strengthen clarity, accuracy and discoverability.
A website design for a law firm next to an AI brain with
10 December 2025
Learn how law firms can strengthen visibility across AI search by improving consistency, structure and trust signals across every online profile.
A website mockup labeled
10 December 2025
Discover how AI interprets your law firm’s website structure and why headings, layout and clarity now determine visibility, trust and recommendations.
Digital graphic of
8 December 2025
How AI decides which law firms own a legal category, how entity graphs shape that decision, and why unclear signals lead to misclassification.
Woman looking at phone, working on laptop at white table in kitchen, near fridge.
8 December 2025
Too busy to read the full article? Here are the key takeaways at a glance. TLDR: Key Takeaways: Pillar 2 information Generative-AI tools often produce inaccurate or fabricated information, including made-up sources and incorrect summaries. Users are noticing these errors and are increasingly cautious, especially when searching for legal or financial information. Legal information is treated as “high stakes”, so people verify anything AI presents by checking official, trustworthy sources. Even when AI mentions a firm correctly, users do not rely on it alone; they immediately look for the firm’s website and authoritative listings. Trust in AI summaries depends heavily on the quality and credibility of the links provided. Clear service descriptions, accurate category signals and consistent online information help protect firms from AI misinterpretation. Strengthening trust signals and accuracy across your digital presence ensures that when clients verify information, your firm becomes the reliable source they turn to.